<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital belles, but no beaux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/2005/05/30/digital-belles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/2005/05/30/digital-belles/</link>
	<description>Because all the other domain names were taken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:53:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Iain</title>
		<link>http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/2005/05/30/digital-belles/comment-page-1/#comment-1024</link>
		<dc:creator>Iain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 11:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/blog/?p=698#comment-1024</guid>
		<description>He may not be in the book (which is unsurprising given the title implies a female-only sample set), but I know a few female gamers who have commented approvingly about the Prince in Prince Of Persia: The Sands Of Time.

Though they were all disappointed to see him turn into a sulky Aragorn ripoff for the sequels. Even the ones who fancy the pants off Viggo Mortensen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He may not be in the book (which is unsurprising given the title implies a female-only sample set), but I know a few female gamers who have commented approvingly about the Prince in Prince Of Persia: The Sands Of Time.</p>
<p>Though they were all disappointed to see him turn into a sulky Aragorn ripoff for the sequels. Even the ones who fancy the pants off Viggo Mortensen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terreus</title>
		<link>http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/2005/05/30/digital-belles/comment-page-1/#comment-1019</link>
		<dc:creator>terreus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 19:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/blog/?p=698#comment-1019</guid>
		<description>I used to do male modelling with Poser, Bryce OR Animation Master. To get them &#039;incredibly detailed&#039; I used to use a &#039;skin&#039; made from a photograph of whoever it was.
Of course you could elaborate or make the person more muscular or thinner than they really were, but the finished image was a good likeness. Also after the image was rendered I used to take the finished image into photoshop to airbrush out any imperfections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to do male modelling with Poser, Bryce OR Animation Master. To get them &#8216;incredibly detailed&#8217; I used to use a &#8216;skin&#8217; made from a photograph of whoever it was.<br />
Of course you could elaborate or make the person more muscular or thinner than they really were, but the finished image was a good likeness. Also after the image was rendered I used to take the finished image into photoshop to airbrush out any imperfections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otis</title>
		<link>http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/2005/05/30/digital-belles/comment-page-1/#comment-1018</link>
		<dc:creator>Otis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 10:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/blog/?p=698#comment-1018</guid>
		<description>I think a large part of it is simply due to hormones, like you say. Computer graphics (and from that, computer games) are largely male areas, and quite visibly testorone-driven at times. Of the detailed graphical models I&#039;ve seen, if they&#039;re not women, they&#039;re sports cars, or guns. I guess it&#039;s not a great deal different from the way men always seem to refer to inanimate objects by female pronous. We&#039;re just a bit odd like that. I don&#039;t think women really have the same biological desire to do that in reverse.

However, to answer your last question, I did come across &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cgtalk.com/showthread.php?t=219323&amp;page=1&amp;pp=15&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;  a few weeks ago, which is not only a male CG model, but also incredibly detailed. The facial hair in particular is amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a large part of it is simply due to hormones, like you say. Computer graphics (and from that, computer games) are largely male areas, and quite visibly testorone-driven at times. Of the detailed graphical models I&#8217;ve seen, if they&#8217;re not women, they&#8217;re sports cars, or guns. I guess it&#8217;s not a great deal different from the way men always seem to refer to inanimate objects by female pronous. We&#8217;re just a bit odd like that. I don&#8217;t think women really have the same biological desire to do that in reverse.</p>
<p>However, to answer your last question, I did come across <a href="http://www.cgtalk.com/showthread.php?t=219323&amp;page=1&amp;pp=15" rel="nofollow">this</a>  a few weeks ago, which is not only a male CG model, but also incredibly detailed. The facial hair in particular is amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

