<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On reshelving books: a humble opinion piece</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/2005/08/17/on-reshelving-books-a-humble-opinion-piece/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/2005/08/17/on-reshelving-books-a-humble-opinion-piece/</link>
	<description>Because all the other domain names were taken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 22:04:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/2005/08/17/on-reshelving-books-a-humble-opinion-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-1337</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 12:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/blog/?p=749#comment-1337</guid>
		<description>We are indeed naughty boys! Pissflaps etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are indeed naughty boys! Pissflaps etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Best</title>
		<link>http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/2005/08/17/on-reshelving-books-a-humble-opinion-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-1336</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Best</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 05:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/blog/?p=749#comment-1336</guid>
		<description>Some people need to get out more ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people need to get out more ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/2005/08/17/on-reshelving-books-a-humble-opinion-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-1335</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/blog/?p=749#comment-1335</guid>
		<description>Welcome to Britain, love...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to Britain, love&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/2005/08/17/on-reshelving-books-a-humble-opinion-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-1334</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/blog/?p=749#comment-1334</guid>
		<description>Wow. That&#039;s me told.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. That&#8217;s me told.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trois Tetes</title>
		<link>http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/2005/08/17/on-reshelving-books-a-humble-opinion-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-1333</link>
		<dc:creator>Trois Tetes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/blog/?p=749#comment-1333</guid>
		<description>Hm, dissertation stresses eh?

Let me give you a pointer Chris. It is not the fact that you use the term &#039;cunt in a shopping trolley&#039; that is worrying. It is the fact that when you think how can I express disapproval the term &#039;cunt&#039; comes to your mind.

For example, when I think about you and your opinions, the terms facile, puerile and stupid come to mind. So much more descriptive. You now know that I think you are a complete idiot. No doubts on your part. Period</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm, dissertation stresses eh?</p>
<p>Let me give you a pointer Chris. It is not the fact that you use the term &#8216;cunt in a shopping trolley&#8217; that is worrying. It is the fact that when you think how can I express disapproval the term &#8216;cunt&#8217; comes to your mind.</p>
<p>For example, when I think about you and your opinions, the terms facile, puerile and stupid come to mind. So much more descriptive. You now know that I think you are a complete idiot. No doubts on your part. Period</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jym</title>
		<link>http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/2005/08/17/on-reshelving-books-a-humble-opinion-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-1332</link>
		<dc:creator>Jym</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/blog/?p=749#comment-1332</guid>
		<description>=v= It&#039;s not exactly difficult to get arrested in New York City. It&#039;s a might liberal and in places radical city, but it&#039;s got a huge jackbooted Republican-run police state apparatus standing on its neck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>=v= It&#8217;s not exactly difficult to get arrested in New York City. It&#8217;s a might liberal and in places radical city, but it&#8217;s got a huge jackbooted Republican-run police state apparatus standing on its neck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angua</title>
		<link>http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/2005/08/17/on-reshelving-books-a-humble-opinion-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-1330</link>
		<dc:creator>angua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 15:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/blog/?p=749#comment-1330</guid>
		<description>There are two kinds of protests out there: ones that make a difference (and therefore, as a consequence, might make you feel good) AND ones that merely make you feel good. Personal example -- I have never flashed a gas station attendant or urinated in front of some oilco offices or whatever is the hip way to protest our dependence on non-renewable fuels these days. What I do is not drive a car. And know that, with my 30 years of non-car-driving, I have made more difference than 100 performance artists with an &quot;I heart Earth&quot; sticker on their SUV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are two kinds of protests out there: ones that make a difference (and therefore, as a consequence, might make you feel good) AND ones that merely make you feel good. Personal example &#8212; I have never flashed a gas station attendant or urinated in front of some oilco offices or whatever is the hip way to protest our dependence on non-renewable fuels these days. What I do is not drive a car. And know that, with my 30 years of non-car-driving, I have made more difference than 100 performance artists with an &#8220;I heart Earth&#8221; sticker on their SUV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/2005/08/17/on-reshelving-books-a-humble-opinion-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-1329</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 13:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/blog/?p=749#comment-1329</guid>
		<description>I should probably also learn to spell chauvinist.  Ho hum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should probably also learn to spell chauvinist.  Ho hum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/2005/08/17/on-reshelving-books-a-humble-opinion-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-1328</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 13:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/blog/?p=749#comment-1328</guid>
		<description>In a tongue-in-cheek, male chauvanist manner, I think we should let Jane off, simply because she looks quite fit on her website thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a tongue-in-cheek, male chauvanist manner, I think we should let Jane off, simply because she looks quite fit on her website thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Merkan</title>
		<link>http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/2005/08/17/on-reshelving-books-a-humble-opinion-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-1327</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Merkan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 20:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/blog/?p=749#comment-1327</guid>
		<description>Oh, word!
Thanks from this very dismayed American! 
We possess (for now) the power to vote these baboons out of office and actually do some good for all of our citizens, but we instead re-elect the fool and complain about what he&#039;s doing through some vanilla quasi-performance game thing. What the hell?
Idiots! This is a country of idiots!
Please keep up the vituperative commentary; we are the selfish adolescent that needs to hear the truth NOW!
Thanks again!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, word!<br />
Thanks from this very dismayed American!<br />
We possess (for now) the power to vote these baboons out of office and actually do some good for all of our citizens, but we instead re-elect the fool and complain about what he&#8217;s doing through some vanilla quasi-performance game thing. What the hell?<br />
Idiots! This is a country of idiots!<br />
Please keep up the vituperative commentary; we are the selfish adolescent that needs to hear the truth NOW!<br />
Thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/2005/08/17/on-reshelving-books-a-humble-opinion-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-1325</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/blog/?p=749#comment-1325</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And to argue that all this action does is cause trouble for “a few hard-working bookstore employees” is strange – don’t all protest actions inconvenience someone, by their very nature?</i></p>
<p>Ruth, the important word in that is <b>all</b>. This protest/art experiment/prank doesn&#8217;t do anything else (if it even does that). Other protests achieve, or at least aim to achieve, some greater purpose. This doesn&#8217;t even seek to make people think a bit more, because the given purpose behind it is so vague and trite that any supposed message is lost. And the comparison to Rosa Parks is fatuous; that was an act of direct civil disobedience. If the Bush administration had actually banned the placing of 1984 in the Current Events section, then I&#8217;d be well behind this, but unless that&#8217;s some obscure subsection of the PATRIOT Act that I wasn&#8217;t aware of, I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s an apt comparison.</p>
<p>The reason for the frustration on display here is that a lot of us feel increasingly alienated from a certain strand of supposedly progressive activism, that seems to view simple acts of mooning at authority as worthy and insightful in themselves; it seems symptomatic a smirking, disengaged complacency that views self-gratifying acts of pranksterism as sufficient action. I thought a large part of the point was that we&#8217;ve actually got the good arguments on our side; we don&#8217;t need to resort to empty displays of symbolism that are so vague and ill-thought out that we can&#8217;t even decide quite what they&#8217;re supposed to symbolise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/2005/08/17/on-reshelving-books-a-humble-opinion-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-1324</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/blog/?p=749#comment-1324</guid>
		<description>Ruth - of course all protests cause some incovenience to someone. The question is, are the right kind of people being inconvenienced? (And incidentally, I&#039;ll bet you any money that policemen are happier getting paid to marshal well-planned, peaceful protests like the anti-war or anti-poverty mass marches of recent years than a random Saturday night in [insert town centre of choice] after chucking-out time). Your analogy with the civil rights protests doesn&#039;t stand up - Rosa Parks &lt;i&gt;et al.&lt;/i&gt; were directly challenging the racially segregated bus system of the time: anyone who disagreed with their protests, thinking they were just making them late, would have thus been complicit in the racist policies of the time: they were the very people who &lt;i&gt;deserved&lt;/i&gt; to be inconvenienced.

One&#039;s local branch of Borders or Barnes &amp; Noble, and the fact they keep current affairs from modern fiction separate, had no influence, direct or otherwise, on whether Bush got elected or not. The staff and customers who get inconvenienced for no reason at all; it&#039;s not their fault things are the way it is, so why take it out on them?

Why did I get personal? Because it is personal. If you think protest should be about pranking and showing off, rather than doing something of note, then that shows you&#039;re basically in it for the ego - you&#039;re a dick and a showoff and need to be taken down a notch. If you think bookshop staff (and ordinary customers) are a fair target for your japery, then you&#039;re a nasty and unfeeling wanker. If you think that &lt;i&gt;Nineteen Eighty-Four&lt;/i&gt; can be used as a simple catch-all allegory of modern-day America, then you&#039;re dogmatic and intellectually lazy to the extreme. These are all (IMHO) loathsome personality traits, which can be and should be shown up for what they are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ruth &#8211; of course all protests cause some incovenience to someone. The question is, are the right kind of people being inconvenienced? (And incidentally, I&#8217;ll bet you any money that policemen are happier getting paid to marshal well-planned, peaceful protests like the anti-war or anti-poverty mass marches of recent years than a random Saturday night in [insert town centre of choice] after chucking-out time). Your analogy with the civil rights protests doesn&#8217;t stand up &#8211; Rosa Parks <i>et al.</i> were directly challenging the racially segregated bus system of the time: anyone who disagreed with their protests, thinking they were just making them late, would have thus been complicit in the racist policies of the time: they were the very people who <i>deserved</i> to be inconvenienced.</p>
<p>One&#8217;s local branch of Borders or Barnes &amp; Noble, and the fact they keep current affairs from modern fiction separate, had no influence, direct or otherwise, on whether Bush got elected or not. The staff and customers who get inconvenienced for no reason at all; it&#8217;s not their fault things are the way it is, so why take it out on them?</p>
<p>Why did I get personal? Because it is personal. If you think protest should be about pranking and showing off, rather than doing something of note, then that shows you&#8217;re basically in it for the ego &#8211; you&#8217;re a dick and a showoff and need to be taken down a notch. If you think bookshop staff (and ordinary customers) are a fair target for your japery, then you&#8217;re a nasty and unfeeling wanker. If you think that <i>Nineteen Eighty-Four</i> can be used as a simple catch-all allegory of modern-day America, then you&#8217;re dogmatic and intellectually lazy to the extreme. These are all (IMHO) loathsome personality traits, which can be and should be shown up for what they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
