<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seeing red</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/2006/03/16/seeing-red/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/2006/03/16/seeing-red/</link>
	<description>Because all the other domain names were taken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:53:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: doctorvee</title>
		<link>http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/2006/03/16/seeing-red/comment-page-1/#comment-1765</link>
		<dc:creator>doctorvee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/blog/?p=857#comment-1765</guid>
		<description>I think it is actually a very common thing for companies to trademark their distinctive colours. I know, for instance, that Cadbury&#039;s has trademarked the colour purple. I think it&#039;s mostly to stop people making the kind of copycat packaging designs that you see in cheap supermarkets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is actually a very common thing for companies to trademark their distinctive colours. I know, for instance, that Cadbury&#8217;s has trademarked the colour purple. I think it&#8217;s mostly to stop people making the kind of copycat packaging designs that you see in cheap supermarkets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/2006/03/16/seeing-red/comment-page-1/#comment-1759</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 13:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/blog/?p=857#comment-1759</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t apply to all uses, just very specific ones. If you used the colour red in a picture of a pretty sunset, no problem. But if you used it to brand your new postal delivery business, then they&#039;d have issues with you.

For example, EasyGroup have their specific colour of orange trademarked, and so there&#039;s a barrier to other companies using it in the businesses Easy are already in. But if Stelios tries to launch an EasyMobilePhone company, there&#039;s not a chance in hell that they&#039;ll get to brand their phones with their trademark orange. Because Orange would sue them to buggery.

I believe that there&#039;s even some fairly strict criteria for the the range of variation around specific trademarked colours (RGB, CMYK, Pantone, however it&#039;s defined) that&#039;s off limits. But I&#039;m not sure exactly how close you can get to a trademarked shade witthout infringing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t apply to all uses, just very specific ones. If you used the colour red in a picture of a pretty sunset, no problem. But if you used it to brand your new postal delivery business, then they&#8217;d have issues with you.</p>
<p>For example, EasyGroup have their specific colour of orange trademarked, and so there&#8217;s a barrier to other companies using it in the businesses Easy are already in. But if Stelios tries to launch an EasyMobilePhone company, there&#8217;s not a chance in hell that they&#8217;ll get to brand their phones with their trademark orange. Because Orange would sue them to buggery.</p>
<p>I believe that there&#8217;s even some fairly strict criteria for the the range of variation around specific trademarked colours (RGB, CMYK, Pantone, however it&#8217;s defined) that&#8217;s off limits. But I&#8217;m not sure exactly how close you can get to a trademarked shade witthout infringing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

